Romans 12:14-16 – Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. Live in harmony with one another. (NIV 1984)
My Musings – Society (having the same root, more or less, as social) appears to be becoming anything but social (can we still call it social media?). Why is it that as civilization becomes more and more polarized, it is becomes less and less civil? How can we restore social to society and civil to civilization? First, a couple thoughts from others.
- Fear, Hate and Disagreement – Our culture has accepted two huge lies. The first is that if you disagree with someone’s lifestyle [views, opinions, beliefs], you must fear or hate them. The second is that to love someone means you agree with everything they believe [say] or do. Both are nonsense. You don’t have to compromise convictions to be compassionate. – Rick Warren
- Crucial Conversations – A discussion between two or more people where (1) stakes are high, (2) opinions vary, and (3) emotions run strong.
It is okay to hold opposing views. It is okay to care passionately about those views. But because the stakes are high (relationships that we care just as passionately about), we must handle these conversations well. People can and do disagree about important issues. Because they feel passionately about their own views and beliefs, emotions can run high. As a result, how we disagree matters (stakes are high) a lot.
One can either digress into threats (fight), revert to silent fuming (flight) or speak openly, honestly and effectively. The question is, when it matters most, are we at our worst (fight or flight and ineffective) or at our best (open, honest, caring and effective)? One can handle them poorly (fight) and face the consequences. One can walk away (flight) and face the consequences. Or one can handle them well (open and honest) and minimize or avoid the consequences altogether.
The irony is, the more crucial the conversation, the less likely we are to handle it well and the more likely the consequences will be broken relationships. Being passionate in our beliefs and being compassionate with those of opposing beliefs are not mutually exclusive. Passion need not result in polemic behavior and compassion need not result in compromised beliefs.
Notes from Crucial Conversations, by Patterson, Grenny, McMillan and Switzler. McGraw Hill, 2012.
Not every conversation, not every issue is crucial. But sometimes what is trivial to one, is of the utmost importance to the other. For example, in 1968 and into 1969, talks to end the Vietnam nearly did not even get started over disagreements (lasting ten weeks) over the shape of the conference table. Trivial to some, crucial to others. Ultimately, however, the stakes (peace – the objective of everyone at the table) were very high.
Many times, there is no absolute right or wrong answer, except to the parties who cannot agree. At other times there is an absolute right and wrong, with someone being absolutely wrong and no way of changing their mind. We cannot control what others view as crucial. What we can control is how we engage. We may still end up disagreeing, but we need not be disagreeable. By the same token, we need not agree to be agreeable.
My Advice – Do not allow passion to extinguish your compassion. Do not allow compassion to compromise your passion. The truth is never afraid of open and honest dialogue.