The Tree of Life

On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. (Revelation 22:2b, NIV 1984).

My Musings – The tree of life. The last time we “saw” it, it was being guarded by an angel with a flaming sword, lest the man and woman “reach out [their] hand and take also from the tree of life and eat.” (Genesis 3:22, NIV 1984). Now, at the end it is no longer guarded by the angel but is open to all who have overcome (Revelation 2:7).  Genesis 3:22, NIV 1984 said that “man had not yet taken of the tree.” If he had done so he would have lived for ever, which in his then fallen state, would have been a curse (live forever in sin) beyond cure.

While some see the tree as symbolic, there is no reason to believe that it could not be an actual tree with literal fruit. The practical effect would be to continue physical life forever. While the verse does not state that the fruit can be eaten, this is presumably the implication.

Interpreters have puzzled over the expression that the tree of life is “on each side of the river.” Some take this is as a group of trees. Others say that the river of life is narrow and that it flows on both sides of the tree.

The description of the tree of life is found in Ezekiel 47:12, which speaks of many trees bearing fruit each month (as opposed to one season a year) and having leaves for healing.  This is essentially repeated in John’s vision, where he states that “the leaves of the trees are for the healing of the nations.” But, why would people in Heaven, the New Jerusalem, need healing? Some believe that this is a reference to the millennium when there might still be sickness that requires healing.

Another meaning could also be indicated. The word translated as healing could also mean be translated as health-giving. The English word therapeutic is derived from this Greek word. Even though there is no sickness in the eternal state, the tree’s fruit and leaves may contribute to the well-being of those in the eternal state.

While the curse of Adam’s sin led to illness (requiring healing) and ultimately to physical death, there will be no more curse in Heaven. Thus, no healing of illness would seem to be necessary.  This has led some commentators to conclude that the leaves are used to treat and sooth the wounds of humanity upon their entrance into the city.

The mention of nations in Revelation 22 suggests that various people groups “from every tribe and language and people and nation” will populate the new earth. This begs the question of who will make up the nations in the new earth?  A closely related question is if the saints are to rule with Christ, who will they be ruling over?

Majority View. This view holds that in the eternal state there will be only glorified beings and that we must not think that the earth will be populated with various nations such as those that exist today.  Rather, those who were faithful in building upon the foundation of Christ (1 Corinthians 3:10-14) will be rewarded with ruling over few or many cities (Luke 19:11-17).  Perhaps those whose works are burnt up (1 Corinthians 3:15), while still citizens in the future Kingdom, will make up the nations that are ruled. 

When Jesus returns, He will reward the faithful servants (Luke 19:15–19), deal with the unfaithful servants (Luke 19:20–26) and judge His enemies (Luke 19:27).  At the Judgment Seat of Christ (for believers – faithful and unfaithful), the Lord will settle the accounts and give each their reward. All believers will be in Heaven, but all will not be rewarded equally.  Until that day, we have control over how we will be rewarded.  We need to occupy ourselves by doing the work He has called us to do until He comes, using the talents and resources that He has provided.

At the Great White Throne Judgment, Jesus will cast His enemies (unbelievers) into Hell.  The unbelievers will clearly not be part of the nations on the new earth.

Minority View. This view sees the nations being populated by men and women in the flesh.  They are not glorified saints, but their flesh is incorruptible flesh nevertheless.  They will not be the offspring of the glorified saints, who “neither marry nor are given in marriage” (Matthew 22:30), but those who lived in the flesh during the millennium yet did not rebel.  They are free from sin and its curse and will have holy offspring.  They will inhabit the earth under the government of the New Jerusalem – glorified saints reigning with Christ. In this view, the New Jerusalem should not be confused with the millennial kingdom. Nor should it be regarded as a mere continuance of it.

The millennial Kingdom is the reign of Christ and the saints over earth and its inhabitants.  These inhabitants will be freed from the assaults of Satan (who is bound for one thousand years) but will still be under the curse and subject to sin (many will rebel when Satan is loosed).

The New Jerusalem period (after the millennium), on the other hand, is the eternal reign of God (Father, Son and Holy Spirit) along with the saints over a race of humans inhabiting a New Earth that has been forever freed from the curse and restored to perfection.

My Advice – Mankind made the wrong choice once, choosing the “forbidden fruit” over the tree of life. But the consequences of that choice can be redeemed through faith in Christ. A second chance. There won’t be another.

Resources:

Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R., & Brown, D. (1997). Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible (Vol. 2, p. 603). Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

Walvoord, John F. (1985). Revelation. In J. F. Walvoord & R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An Exposition of the Scriptures (Vol. 2, p. 987-988). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

Keener, C. S. (1993). The IVP Bible background commentary: New Testament (Re 22:2). Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Barry, J. D., Heiser, M. S., Custis, M., Mangum, D., & Whitehead, M. M. (2012). Faithlife Study Bible (Re 22:2). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 2, pp. 623–624). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 580). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

Wiersbe, W. W. (1992). Wiersbe’s expository outlines on the New Testament (p. 192). Wheaton, IL: Victor Books.

Lange, J. P., Schaff, P., Moore, E., Craven, E. R., & Woods, J. H. (2008). A commentary on the Holy Scriptures: Revelation (pp. 391–392). Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.

Unknown's avatar

Author: thebrewisamusing

I was raised in a Christian family and my earliest childhood memories include regular Sunday school and Church attendance as a family. I was taught that our Judeo-Christian values were not just a part of our Sunday routine they should be part of our character and influence all aspects of our lives. I was also taught that as important as these values were they could not save us. We must also be “born again” by accepting Christ.

2 thoughts on “The Tree of Life”

  1. Another great overview. I appreciate the work you put into these posts. I like your line: “We need to occupy ourselves by doing the work He has called us to do until He comes, using the talents and resources that He has provided.” I think this is something we can all agree on.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Chris G Thelen Cancel reply