Fake Theology

Fake Theology

Time for another Sunday amusing.  But as I am sure you are finding, what appears to be amusing at first, may not be after all.  Read on.

Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine – Source unknown.

We both laugh and complain about change.  Yet this quote has it all wrong.  There is something else, or rather someone else, who does not change:

Malachi 3:6 – “I the LORD do not change” (NIV 1984).

My Musing – But sometimes it sure seems like it, when you consider what passes for right and wrong nowadays.  Still God has not changed.  And neither has mankind.  We are still looking for ways to twist God’s moral standards to suit our own needs and desires.  We recreate God in our own image and accept “fake theology” as a substitute for  the truth.  As Christians. we must relentlessly guard God’s truth, hide it in our hearts and share it with others with gentleness and respect.  Because, despite what Arlo might say, change is a big deal if we are changing what God says.

But there is so much of this fake theology out there, that we have to ask ourselves how can we be relentless in guarding the truth? As one evaluates any new teaching or teacher, the following are some questions worth considering.

Is the new teaching from a well-known and trusted source? Be suspicious of those who teach the opposite of long-standing Christian views. But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures.  (2 Timothy 3:14, 15) 

Is the new teaching consistent with what you have learned from the well-known and trusted sources? Be wary of new revelations of the truth that are contrary to what is more widely accepted as the truth.  God’s word does not change.  I urge you brothers, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned.  (Romans 16:17)

Is the new teaching clear from the texts (remember – context matters)? Views that rely upon conjecture, suppositions and assumptions to develop positions that are not consistent with the most logical interpretation are suspect.  In most cases, the simplest explanation is the one that is the most likely to be the truth (Ockham’s Razor).  “You strain out a gnat but swallow a camel.”  (Matthew 23:24)

Is the new teaching exclusive or nearly exclusive? Be suspicious of “private” or personalized interpretations that are self-serving or that cater to a select group of individuals that form a small minority within the Christian community or in society at large.  Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation. (2 Peter 1:20)

Is the new teaching necessary to support a questionable lifestyle? If the views are necessary in order to justify the desired lifestyle and soothe the conscience of a special interest group or they are considered questionable by the vast majority of the Christian community and Biblical scholars, they should be considered false teaching and be rejected.  For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine.  Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.  (2 Timothy 4:3)

Does the new teaching direct society to follow God’s moral standards or does the new teaching encourage others to follow the world’s social mores? Society rarely if ever alerts our conscience to existing but long ignored Judeo-Christian moral standards that result in a “great awakening.” Instead, they usually promote a new social more that is sensitive to a particular cause and that subsequently leads to a re-interpretation of traditional theology so that it is consistent with the new social more.  Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.  (Romans 12:21)

Is the new teaching’s emphasis on grace and freedom too permissive? While it is true that salvation is by grace and that we are no longer under the law, be careful of any new teaching that excuses sinful behavior on the basis of grace and freedom.  We are still called to live Godly lives.  You my brothers, were called to be free.  But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature.  (Galatians 5:13)

Is the new teaching’s emphasis on morality and obedience too repressive? While there is no compromising on morality, and we are called to live Godly lives (not to obtain salvation, but rather to maintain fellowship with God and to please Him), we must guard against becoming “21st century Christian Pharisees,” with our own set of legalistic rules and regulations that are motivated by ritualistic conformity and not by a transformed heart.  Jesus was very clear about His distaste for such teaching.  We all have a sin nature and to sin is consistent with that nature.  But just because it is part of our nature does not mean we should excuse it.  We must allow the Holy Spirit to transform it.  “Woe to you, blind guides!  You say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it means nothing; but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by the oath.’ You blind fools!”  (Matthew 23:16, 17)

Does the new teaching deny the power of God to enable His children to overcome sin and temptation? God is in the business of changing lives.  It starts with justification by God’s grace through faith in Christ (salvation, a one-time event) and continues throughout a believer’s lifetime as they learn to walk in obedience, exhibit the fruits of the Spirit and live as servants (sanctification, a continual process).  What we are powerless to do ourselves we are empowered to do though the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.  This includes victory over sin and temptation as well as maturing in the faith.   And that is what some of you were.  But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 6:11)

Does the new teaching follow Satan’s pattern of masquerading as angel of light? Some things are obviously satanic and easily recognized.  But when it is to his advantage, Satan and his followers will appear as agents of light to lead us away from the true light.  We should not be too quick to accept things packaged as Christianity, especially if they are contrary to traditional and widely-accepted teaching.  It may appear Godly, packaged as a manifestation of God’s grace, but upon closer examination it is evident that it is contradictory to the Word.  For such men are false apostles of Christ.  And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.  It is not surprising then, if his servants masquerade as servants of righteousness.  (1 Corinthians11:13-14)

Does the new teaching follow Satan’s pattern of deceit by calling God’s word into question?  Satan’s very first tactic, which led to the fall, was to cause God’s children to question what God had said.  Our first impulse, when confronted with a new teaching should be to determine if it fits this pattern of deceit.   If, in order to accept the teaching, one has to question (reject or set aside) what has universally been understood as the truth for centuries, it should be rejected.  Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. 

Does the new teaching call right wrong and wrong right?  In the final analysis, this is the key question.   As much as one might want to believe it is the truth, it is a false teaching. Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.  (Isaiah 5:20) 

Still, the best method for identifying fake theology is the method the Bereans employed. Like the Bereans, we must study the relevant scriptures for ourselves to determine whether it is fake theology or God’s truth. We must do this no matter how trustworthy the source (or musing) may seem. Paul was trustworthy, but the Bereans still searched the scriptures to be certain of the truth. Some of our advisors (friends, counselors, mentors, books, organizations, churches, and support groups) will seem genuine but may have their own agenda (whether they admit it or even realize it). Others may actually be genuine in their efforts to help, but may still be genuinely wrong. Being genuine is certainly a virtue, but it is not a substitute for the truth.

The search for the truth is hard in this day of rapid change, unless one has a trustworthy guide.  We can trust God’s Word and His Holy Spirit to guide us into all truth.

My Advice – Be a relentless guardian of God’s truth, hide it in your heart and share it with others with gentleness and respect.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s